From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Satrustegui

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1854
4 Cal. 244 (Cal. 1854)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District.

         COUNSEL

          Barbour, for Appellant.

          Halleck, Peachy, Billings & Park, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Mr. Ch. J. Murray delivered the opinion of the Court. Mr. J. Heydenfeldt concurred.

         OPINION

          MURRAY, Judge

         By the previous decisions of this Court we are compelled to decide that the statement in this case has not been made in conformity to the statute, and is no part of the record. The case must therefore rest upon the judgment roll.

         The only error relied on, at least of consequence, is, that the declaration does not allege a delivery of the bond sued on. This was a defect in pleading, which might have been taken advantage of on demurrer, but not having been so taken advantage of, is cured by the verdict. (See 1 Chitty's Pleadings, § 912.)

         Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Satrustegui

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1854
4 Cal. 244 (Cal. 1854)
Case details for

Garcia v. Satrustegui

Case Details

Full title:JUAN GARCIA, Respondent, v. M. de SATRUSTEGUI, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1854

Citations

4 Cal. 244 (Cal. 1854)

Citing Cases

Merritt v. Glidden

         The objection that the facts are stated by way of recital, can only be taken by special demurrer.…