Opinion
Civil Action 1:22-cv-00102
01-24-2023
GREGORIO GARCIA, III, “Plaintiff”, v. BERNADETTE RODRIGUEZ, et al “Defendants”.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROLANDO OLVERA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court are these pleadings: Plaintiff's “Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights” (“Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 1), Defendants' “Motion to Dismiss” (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 29), and the “Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 41). The R&R recommends this Court grant, in part, and deny, in part, Defendants' Motion (Dkt. No. 29).
No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED.
Defendants' Motion (Dkt. No. 29) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED in part.