From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Nov 17, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-cv-00101 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:22-cv-00101

11-17-2022

GREGORIO GARCIA, III, “Plaintiff,” v. BERNADETTE RODRIGUEZ, et al. “Defendants.”


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Rolando Olvera United States District Judge

Before the Court are these pleadings: Plaintiffs pro se “Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint” (“Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 1) and the “Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 11). The R&R recommends (1) dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) with prejudice, (2) directing the Clerk of Court to close this case, (3) designating the dismissal as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), (3) instructing the Clerk of Court to send notice of dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas, and (4) notifying Plaintiff that, because he has accumulated more than three strikes, he will be unable to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal, if he files that action or appeal while incarcerated or detained in any facility, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED:

1. Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. The Clerk of court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

3. Plaintiff is hereby NOTIFIED that the DISMISSAL of Plaintiff s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is designated as a STRIKE for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

4. The District Court Clerk is ORDERED to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas.

5. Plaintiff is hereby NOTIFIED that he has accumulated more than three strikes. Plaintiff will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal if he files that action or appeal while incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Nov 17, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-cv-00101 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Garcia v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:GREGORIO GARCIA, III, “Plaintiff,” v. BERNADETTE RODRIGUEZ, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 17, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:22-cv-00101 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2022)