From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Praxair, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
1:18-cv-01493-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

1:18-cv-01493-SAB

09-17-2021

PATRICK GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. PRAXAIR, INC., Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECF NO. 74)

On September 16, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 74.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys' fees.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Praxair, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
1:18-cv-01493-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Garcia v. Praxair, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. PRAXAIR, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

1:18-cv-01493-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)