From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Paulino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1717N, 1717NA

October 2, 2003.

Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne Renwick, J.), entered September 13, 2002 and March 4, 2003, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment and granted defendant's cross motion seeking an extension to file his answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

John Marshall, for plaintiff-appellant.

Anne Marlow Moran, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Saxe, Williams, JJ.


Under all the relevant circumstances, including defendant's proffer of a reasonable excuse for failing to answer the complaint, the motion court properly exercised its discretion in granting defendant an extension to serve his answer ( see CPLR 3012[d]; Mufalli v. Ford Motor Co., 105 A.D.2d 642, 643-644).

Motion seeking leave to strike brief denied.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Paulino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Garcia v. Paulino

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIA GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAFAEL PAULINO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 246