From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Padgett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 31, 2023
2:21-cv-0875 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0875 AC P

03-31-2023

WILLIAM GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. T. PADGETT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are three motions filed by plaintiff. ECF Nos. 13-15. In one of the motions, plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. This request will be denied as moot because plaintiff has already paid the filing fee in full. Plaintiff also asks that the Court move forward with screening his complaint. Plaintiff's motions in this regard will be granted, and his complaint will be screened in due course.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 13) is DENIED as moot;
2. Plaintiff's motions to move the case forward (ECF Nos. 14-15) are GRANTED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Padgett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 31, 2023
2:21-cv-0875 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Garcia v. Padgett

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. T. PADGETT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 31, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-0875 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2023)