From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Orr

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
4:22-cv-01137-JSW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

4:22-cv-01137-JSW

11-02-2022

Orlando Garcia, Plaintiff, v. Mary Louise Orr; Francisco Chavarria; Ruth Chavarria Defendant.

CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS Amanda Seabock, Esq., SBN 289900 Prathima Price, Esq., SBN 321378 Dennis Price, Esq., SBN 279082 Naomi Butler, Esq., SBN 332664 Attorneys for Plaintiff LAW OFFICE OF KATHERINE R MOORE Katherine R. Moore, Esq., SBN 199808 David Banie, Esq., SBN 217924 Charles P. Stone, Esq., SBN 224897 Attorney for Defendants


CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS

Amanda Seabock, Esq., SBN 289900

Prathima Price, Esq., SBN 321378

Dennis Price, Esq., SBN 279082

Naomi Butler, Esq., SBN 332664 Attorneys for Plaintiff

LAW OFFICE OF KATHERINE R MOORE

Katherine R. Moore, Esq., SBN 199808

David Banie, Esq., SBN 217924

Charles P. Stone, Esq., SBN 224897 Attorney for Defendants

CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

TO THE COURT, ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

1. Plaintiff, ORLANDO GARCIA, filed this action (known as Case No. 4:22-cv-01137-JSW) against Defendant Mary Louise Orr; Francisco Chavarria; Ruth Chavarria, (hereinafter, “Defendants”) seeking money damages and injunctive relief for, inter alia, violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA"), Unruh Civil Rights Act and corresponding state law claims, as well as common law claims, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on February 24, 2022. Dkt.1. Defendant Mary Louise Orr; Francisco Chavarria; Ruth Chavarria, ("Defendants") filed their Answer on May 20, 2022. Dkt. 12.

2. Defendants and Plaintiff (collectively sometimes referred to herein as the “Parties” or separately as a “Party”) wish to settle the portion of the case relating to issues of injunctive relief and hereby desire to enter into this Consent Decree. The Parties hereby enter into this Consent Decree and Order for the purpose of resolving certain specified aspects of the lawsuit without the need for protracted litigation, and without the admission of any liability by either Party whatsoever, including but not limited to liability as to the issues of damages and/or fees.

JURISDICTION:

3. Plaintiff asserts that the Court has jurisdiction of this matter for alleged violations of he Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq., pursuant to supplemental urisdiction under California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, and 28 U.S.C. §1331, §1343(a)(3) and (a)(4) and §1391(b).

4. In order to avoid the costs, expense, and uncertainty of protracted litigation, the Parties agree to entry of this Order to resolve all claims regarding injunctive relief raised in the above-entitled Action. Accordingly, the Parties agree to the entry of the proposed Order related to his Consent Decree without trial or further adjudication of the issues addressed herein.

NO DISMISSAL OF ACTION REQUESTED:

5. As noted herein, monetary issues are still at issue and accordingly the Parties do not request that the Honorable Court dismiss the action at this time.

WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree and stipulate to the Court's entry of this Consent Decree and Order, which provides as follows:

SETTLEMENT OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF:

6. This Order shall be a full, complete, and final disposition and settlement of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants and any other parties for injunctive relief that have arisen out of the acts and/or omissions alleged, or which could have been alleged, in the subject Complaint.

7. The Parties agree and stipulate that the corrective work will be performed in compliance with Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

8. Remedial Measures: The corrective work agreed upon by the Parties is attached here o as Exhibit “A”. Defendants agree to undertake all of the remedial work set forth therein.

9. Timing of Injunctive Relief: Exhibit “A” also includes the estimated timeframe for completing the work described therein. In the event that unforeseen difficulties prevent Defendants from completing any of the agreed-upon injunctive relief within the timeframes specified, Defendants or their counsel will notify Plaintiff's counsel, in writing, within fifteen (15) days after discovering any such difficulties. Defendants, or their counsel, will promptly notify Plaintiff's counsel when the corrective work is complete, and in any case, will provide a status report on or before April 15, 2023.

ISSUES RELATED TO DAMAGES, ATTORNEYS FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES, AND COSTS REMAIN UNRESOLVED:

10. The Parties have not reached an agreement regarding Plaintiff's claims for damages, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses and costs in this Action (collectively, the “Unresolved Issues”). These Unresolved Issues shall be the subject of further negotiation, settlement, litigation, and/or motions to the Court. Should the Parties later reach an agreement regarding the Unresolved Issues, he terms of that agreement will be set forth in a separate settlement agreement. Nothing set forth herein shall be deemed to in any way limit or effect a waiver of either Parties' past, present, or future rights and/or remedies to recover damages, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, or costs in connection with each of their alleged losses, costs, damages, claims, and causes of action as set forth in each of he operative pleadings or otherwise.

ENTIRE CONSENT ORDER: (Dkt. No. 25-1)

11. This Consent Decree and Order and Exhibit “A” to the Consent Decree, which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth in this document, constitute the entire agreement between the signing Parties on all matters of injunctive relief, and no other statement, promise, or agreement, either written or oral, made by any of the Parties or agents of any of the Parties, that is not contained in this written Consent Decree and Order, shall be enforceable regarding the matters of injunctive relief specifically described herein.

TERM OF THE CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER:

12. This Consent Decree and Order shall be in full force and effect for a period of twenty-four (24) months after the date of entry of this Consent Decree and Order, or until the injunctive relief contemplated by this Order is completed, whichever occurs later. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to enforce provisions of this Order for twenty-four (24) months after the date of this Consent Decree, or until the relief contemplated by this Order is completed, whichever occurs later.

SEVERABILITY:

13. If any term of this Consent Decree and Order is determined by any court to be unenforceable, all other terms of this Consent Decree and Order shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect.

SIGNATORIES BIND PARTIES:

14. Signatories on the behalf of the Parties represent that they are authorized to bind the Parties to this Consent Decree and Order. This Consent Decree and Order may be signed in counterparts and a facsimile or e-mail signature shall have the same force and effect as an original signature.

15. Electronic signatures may also bind the Parties and/or their representative(s) as set forth in all applicable Local Rules. The undersigned counsel for Plaintiff does hereby attest that all electronic signatures are affixed only with the express written permission of the signatory.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Orr

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
4:22-cv-01137-JSW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Garcia v. Orr

Case Details

Full title:Orlando Garcia, Plaintiff, v. Mary Louise Orr; Francisco Chavarria; Ruth…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

4:22-cv-01137-JSW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)