From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Mongomery

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 7, 2022
CV 22-6737 JGB (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-6737 JGB (MRW)

11-07-2022

Garcia v. Mongomery


PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Present: The Honorable Michael R. Wilner judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Honorable Michael R. Wilner judge

1. After screening Petitioner's habeas corpus petition, the Court (Magistrate Judge Wilner) ordered Petitioner to submit a supplemental statement addressing several obvious defects with the habeas action. (Docket # 4.) Petitioner failed to file an appropriate response.

2. Petitioner is ordered to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim and for failing to comply with a court order. Petitioner's response to the OSC and the substantive supplemental statement are due by or before December 2, 2022.

Failure to file a timely submission as directed above will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and obey Court orders pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Lichtenegger, 913 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2019).


Summaries of

Garcia v. Mongomery

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 7, 2022
CV 22-6737 JGB (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Garcia v. Mongomery

Case Details

Full title:Garcia v. Mongomery

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

CV 22-6737 JGB (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)