From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. McEwen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 17, 2014
CV 11-9145-DDP (OP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2014)

Opinion

          Joe V Garcia, Petitioner, Pro se, San Luis Obispo, CA.

          For Leland McEwen, Respondent: David A Wildman, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          HONORABLE DEAN D. PREGERSON, United States District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; (2) denying Respondent's Motion to Dismiss as moot; and (3) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Garcia v. McEwen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 17, 2014
CV 11-9145-DDP (OP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Garcia v. McEwen

Case Details

Full title:JOE V. GARCIA, Petitioner, v. LELAND McEWEN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 17, 2014

Citations

CV 11-9145-DDP (OP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2014)