From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Mash Petroleum Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 21, 2021
21-cv-03706-SK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-03706-SK

07-21-2021

ORLANDO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. MASH PETROLEUM INC., Defendant.


Regarding Docket No. 12

CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

SALLIE KIM, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff advises the Court that the parties have reached a settlement of this case and that Plaintiff expects to file a dismissal with prejudice within sixty days. (Dkt. 12.) All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Dkts. 7, 11.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Mash Petroleum Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 21, 2021
21-cv-03706-SK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Garcia v. Mash Petroleum Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. MASH PETROLEUM INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

Citations

21-cv-03706-SK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)