From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Lee

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 22, 2021
2:20-cv-02179-RGK-GJS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02179-RGK-GJS

10-22-2021

Orlando Garcia v. Jin Hynk Lee et al


Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

On March 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed this action, alleging claims for violation of the ADA and UNRUH Civil Rights Act. On April 22, 2021, the Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the UNRUH claim, leaving only the ADA claim at issue in this case. On September 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Compliance, stating that Defendant has presented evidence that the paths of travel inside the subject store have now been brought into compliance with ADA standards. Therefore, Plaintiff no longer seeks injunctive relief, which is the only remedy available to Plaintiff on an ADA claim, hi light of this Notice, the Court hereby dismisses the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Garcia v. Lee

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 22, 2021
2:20-cv-02179-RGK-GJS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Garcia v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:Orlando Garcia v. Jin Hynk Lee et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 22, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-02179-RGK-GJS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2021)