From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Jones

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Aug 5, 2022
Civ. 6:22-cv-00118-AA (D. Or. Aug. 5, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. 6:22-cv-00118-AA

08-05-2022

JEREMY GARCIA; Plaintiffs, v. ALEXANDER JONES; SHELBY FOLDEN; LINN COUNTY COURT HOUSE; LINN COUNTY SHERIFF; ALBANY POLICE DEPARTMENT; OREGON STATE CREDIT UNION, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

ANN AIKEN, United States District Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff Jeremy Garcia originally sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action, ECF No. 2, and moved for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3. After screening Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. 1, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court determined that Plaintiff failed to state a claim according to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. See Order, at 4, ECF No. 8.

Ultimately Plaintiff chose to proceed without IFP status and filed an amended Complaint. ECF No. 10. In its July 14, 2022 Opinion and Order, ECF No. 62, the Court granted certain Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. 20, 21, and 25. The Court ordered that within fourteen days of the date of its Order, Plaintiff must show good cause in writing why he had not properly served Defendants FBI and Linn County Court House. ECF No. 62.

Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's Order and the time for filing has now passed. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES this case without prejudice and final judgment shall be entered accordingly.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Jones

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Aug 5, 2022
Civ. 6:22-cv-00118-AA (D. Or. Aug. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Garcia v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY GARCIA; Plaintiffs, v. ALEXANDER JONES; SHELBY FOLDEN; LINN COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Aug 5, 2022

Citations

Civ. 6:22-cv-00118-AA (D. Or. Aug. 5, 2022)