From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2016
No. CV 13-6864 JFW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2016)

Opinion

No. CV 13-6864 JFW (FFM)

07-13-2016

JUANITA CELIA GARCIA, Petitioner, v. DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Neither Petitioner nor Respondent has filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Claim Five of the Second Amended Petition is dismissed with prejudice as untimely. DATED: July 13, 2016

/s/_________

JOHN F. WALTER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Garcia v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2016
No. CV 13-6864 JFW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Garcia v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JUANITA CELIA GARCIA, Petitioner, v. DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2016

Citations

No. CV 13-6864 JFW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2016)

Citing Cases

Noble v. Adams

That Mr. Noble's original petition applied different legal labels to his claims does not obscure their common…