From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 21, 2014
No. 12-73260 (9th Cir. Jan. 21, 2014)

Opinion

No. 12-73260 Agency No. A095-191-780

01-21-2014

PABLO FELIPE MORAN GARCIA, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Pablo Felipe Moran Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying his request for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance and review de novo due process claims. Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Moran Garcia's request for a continuance so that he could testify in his sons' removal proceedings where Moran Garcia did not show good cause for a continuance. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an immigration judge may grant a motion to continue for good cause shown); see also Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247. It follows that his due process challenge to the agency's denial also fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (petitioner must show error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 21, 2014
No. 12-73260 (9th Cir. Jan. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Garcia v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:PABLO FELIPE MORAN GARCIA, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 21, 2014

Citations

No. 12-73260 (9th Cir. Jan. 21, 2014)