Opinion
No. 148 SSM 37
12-14-2017
Submitted by Jonathan A. Dachs, for appellant. Submitted by Richard A. Fogel, for respondent.
Submitted by Jonathan A. Dachs, for appellant.
Submitted by Richard A. Fogel, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. There is no ambiguity in the policy as to coverage or divisibility. The parties contracted for $2 million of coverage. Plaintiff's remaining contention lacks merit. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Decided December 14, 2017