From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jul 26, 2019
No. CV 18-01240 KG/KK (D.N.M. Jul. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. CV 18-01240 KG/KK

07-26-2019

DAVID I. GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. JASON GARCIA, FNU CHAVIRA, FNU ALIMON, JOHN DOE, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) on the Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by David I. Garcia (Doc. 1). The Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a Court order and failure to prosecute.

Mailings to Plaintiff Garcia at his address of record were returned as undelivered. (Doc. 4, 5). The Court then issued an Order to Show Cause on January 23, 2019, directing Garcia to notify the Court of a new address, or otherwise show cause why the case should not be dismissed, within 21 days of entry of the Order. (Doc. 6). Additional mail, including the copy of the Court's Order to Show Cause mailed to Garcia's address of record, was also returned as undelivered. (Doc. 7, 8). The Court's review of the La Plata County, Colorado records confirms that Garcia is no longer in the custody of the La Plata County correctional facility. More than 21 days has elapsed since entry of the Order to Show Cause and Garcia has not provided the Court with a new address, responded to the Court's Order, or otherwise shown cause why the case should not be dismissed.

Pro se litigants are required to follow the federal rules of procedure and simple, nonburdensome local rules. See Bradenburg v. Beaman, 632 F.2d 120, 122 (10 Cir. 1980). The local rules require litigants, including prisoners, to keep the Court apprised of their proper mailing address and to maintain contact with the Court. D.N.M. LR-Civ. 83.6. Plaintiff Garcia has failed to comply with D.N.M. LR-Civ. 83.6 and with the Court's January 23, 2019 Order to Show Cause.

Plaintiff Garcia has failed to comply with the Court's order and failed to prosecute this action by not keeping the Court apprised of his current address. The Court may dismiss an action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute, to comply with the rules of civil procedure, or to comply with court orders. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204, n. 3 (10 Cir. 2003). Therefore, the Court will dismiss this civil proceeding pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with the Court's Order and failure to prosecute this proceeding.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by David I. Garcia (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with the Court's order and failure to prosecute.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Garcia v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jul 26, 2019
No. CV 18-01240 KG/KK (D.N.M. Jul. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Garcia v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:DAVID I. GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. JASON GARCIA, FNU CHAVIRA, FNU ALIMON, JOHN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jul 26, 2019

Citations

No. CV 18-01240 KG/KK (D.N.M. Jul. 26, 2019)