From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Foresythe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Mar 30, 2015
No. CIV-14-123-C (W.D. Okla. Mar. 30, 2015)

Opinion

No. CIV-14-123-C

03-30-2015

MARSIAL R. GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC FORESYTHE, SHANE WHITE, DEBRA KEEF, CORWAN KING, KARIN HAYES, AMY CRAIG, FNU STEPHENS, and FNU FREEBORN, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Supplemental Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge February 25, 2015. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 85) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and judgment is entered for all Defendants against Plaintiff; EXCEPT Plaintiff's claim for "price-gouging" is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of March, 2015.

/s/_________

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Garcia v. Foresythe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Mar 30, 2015
No. CIV-14-123-C (W.D. Okla. Mar. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Garcia v. Foresythe

Case Details

Full title:MARSIAL R. GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC FORESYTHE, SHANE WHITE, DEBRA KEEF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Mar 30, 2015

Citations

No. CIV-14-123-C (W.D. Okla. Mar. 30, 2015)