From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Conway

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 14, 2012
09-CV-6622L(Fe) (W.D.N.Y. May. 14, 2012)

Opinion

09-CV-6622L(Fe)

05-14-2012

JASON GARCIA, 12A1774, Plaintiff, v. MR. JAMES CONWAY, Supt., MR. CHAPPIUS, Deputy of Security, MR. P. CONNALLY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ANTHONY WITKOWSKI, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DANIEL HEINTZ and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER M. MEYER, Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested appointment of counsel pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). This Court is required to see that all litigants receive proper representation of counsel under the criteria set forth in Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1989), and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986) . In addition, courts have the inherent authority to assign counsel to represent private indigent litigants. See In re Smiley, 36 N.Y.2d 433, 438 (1975).

Additionally, each lawyer — especially those who are admitted to practice in federal court and who therefore are in a position to reap the benefits of such practice — has a professional obligation to provide pro bono services for the poor. See New York Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1. In addition, Rule 83.1(g) of the Local

Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows:

Every member of the bar of this Court shall be available upon the Court's request for appointment
to represent or assist in the representation of indigent parties. Appointments under this rule shall be made in a manner such that no attorney shall be requested to accept more than one appointment during any twelve month period.

It is in this spirit that the Court assigns Peter J. Gregory, Esq. of McConville, Considine, Cooman & Morin, P.C., 25 E. Main Street, Suite 500, Rochester, New York 14614, pro bono, to faithfully and diligently represent plaintiff in this case.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to copy that portion of the file in this matter that is not currently available through PACER on the Court's Case Management/Electronic Case Management System and send it to Peter J. Gregory, together with a copy of this order and the Guidelines Governing Reimbursement from the District Court Fund of Expenses Incurred by Court Appointed Counsel. The Chief Judge of the Court will also issue an Order directing PACER to waive its fees so pro bono counsel can access and print at no cost to him or his firm any other documents filed herein that he may need. Plaintiff's attorney is directed to contact the Court by June 18, 2012 to request a date for a status conference to discuss further proceedings in the case

This information and the forms are also available on the Court's web site at the Attorney Information link from the home page located at: http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/document/fundreimbvoweb.pdf.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

JONATHAN W. FELDMAN

TED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: May 14, 2012

Rochester, New York


Summaries of

Garcia v. Conway

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 14, 2012
09-CV-6622L(Fe) (W.D.N.Y. May. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Garcia v. Conway

Case Details

Full title:JASON GARCIA, 12A1774, Plaintiff, v. MR. JAMES CONWAY, Supt., MR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 14, 2012

Citations

09-CV-6622L(Fe) (W.D.N.Y. May. 14, 2012)