From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. City of N.Y.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 16, 2012
12 CV 5428 (MKB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2012)

Opinion

12 CV 5428 (MKB)

11-16-2012

GERMAINE GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK; ATTORNEY AT LAW DAVID SEAMEN, Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

MARGO K. BRODIE, United States District Judge:

On October 25, 2012, plaintiff Germaine Garcia, currently incarcerated at Rikers Island Correctional Facility, filed the instant pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The instant complaint is an exact duplicate of Plaintiff s pending § 1983 complaint. See Garcia v. City of New York, No. 12-CV-4655 (MKB). Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served by the litigation of this duplicative complaint.

"As part of its general power to administer its docket, a district court may stay or dismiss a suit that is duplicative of another federal court suit." Curtis v. Citibank, N.A., 226 F.3d 133, 138 (2d Cir. 2000); see also Raniere v. Citigroup Inc., 827 F. Supp. 2d 294, 301 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) ("The power to dismiss duplicative suits is meant to foster judicial economy and the 'comprehensive disposition of litigation' as well as to protect parties from the vexation of concurrent litigation over the same subject." (citing Curtis, 226 F.3d at 138)). "An action is duplicative 'if the claims, parties, and available relief do not significantly differ between the two actions.'" Amusement Indus., Inc. v. Midland Ave. Assocs., LLC, 820 F. Supp. 2d 510, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (quoting N. Assurance Co. of Am. v. Square D Co., 201 F.3d 84, 89 (2d Cir. 2000)). There is no difference between the two actions. Therefore, the instant complaint is dismissed without prejudice to the litigation pending in Garcia v. City of New York., No. 12-CV-4655 (MKB).

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis is denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

MARGO K. BRODIE

United States District Judge
Dated: November 16, 2012

Brooklyn, New York


Summaries of

Garcia v. City of N.Y.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 16, 2012
12 CV 5428 (MKB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Garcia v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:GERMAINE GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK; ATTORNEY AT LAW DAVID…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

12 CV 5428 (MKB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2012)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Thompson

The above-captioned action represents Plaintiff's fifth lawsuit filed in this Court regarding his state court…