From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Bryan

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jan 30, 2006
05 CV 5335 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2006)

Opinion

05 CV 5335 (ARR).

January 30, 2006

Adam J. Fishbein, P.C., Attorney At Law Attorney for the Plaintiff Woodmere, New York.


STIPULATION OF DISCONTINUANCE WITH PREJUDICE


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel on behalf of their respective clients, (the defendant not having appeared) that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), this action shall be, and it hereby is, dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. Any claims of any putative class members are dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Garcia v. Bryan

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jan 30, 2006
05 CV 5335 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Garcia v. Bryan

Case Details

Full title:GARCIA Plaintiff, v. GOODWIN BRYAN, LLP Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jan 30, 2006

Citations

05 CV 5335 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2006)