From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Bruderer

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Jan 16, 2002
24598 (Haw. Jan. 16, 2002)

Opinion

24598

January 16, 2002.

APPEAL FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 00-1-0235)

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, RAMIL, and ACOBA, JJ.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Upon review of the record, it appears that the September 24, 2001 order granting sanctions under HRCP Rule 11 is not immediately appealable by plaintiff Garcia, who can seek review of the order on appeal from a final judgment in Civil No. 00-1-0235. See Siangco v. Kasadate, 77 Haw. 157, 883 P.2d 78 (1994). The September 24, 2001 order, which imposes sanctions against Garcia's attorney, is appealable by the attorney, Phillip Carey, but the September 28, 2001 notice of appeal did not name Carey as a party on appeal. See HRAP 3(c); Stewart Properties, Inc. v. Brennan, 8 Haw. App. 431, 435, 807 P.2d 606, 608 (1991); Gold v. Harrison, 88 Haw. 94, 103-04, 962 P.2d 353, 362-63 (1998). Thus, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Bruderer

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Jan 16, 2002
24598 (Haw. Jan. 16, 2002)
Case details for

Garcia v. Bruderer

Case Details

Full title:TERESITA GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DAVID BRUDERER, Defendant-Appellee…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Jan 16, 2002

Citations

24598 (Haw. Jan. 16, 2002)