From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Baldwin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2021
1:19-cv-00184-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00184-DAD-SAB (PC)

06-29-2021

GUILLERMO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. M. BALDWIN, et.al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO REFILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS

Plaintiff Guillermo Garcia is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 15, 2021, Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe conducted a settlement conference, during which the parties reached a settlement agreement, with terms stated on the record. All dates were vacated and the Court agreed to retain jurisdiction for one year. On June 25, 2021, the parties filed dispositional documents. Although the parties agreed to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the stipulation does not indicate the one year time period in retaining such jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall refile the dispositional documents to include the necessary language within five (5) days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Baldwin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2021
1:19-cv-00184-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Garcia v. Baldwin

Case Details

Full title:GUILLERMO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. M. BALDWIN, et.al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-00184-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)