From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Jan 3, 2012
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00542 SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00542 SKO

01-03-2012

JULIO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration ROYA MASSOUMI Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Respondent


STIPULATION AND ORDER

The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court's approval as indicated by issuance of the attached Order, that Respondent shall have an extension of time of 30 days in which to respond to Plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees. This is Defendant's first request for an extension to respond to Plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees. There is good cause for this extension because Assigned Special Assistant United States Attorney has a heavy case load due to the departures of numerous senior attorneys from Defendant's Office of Regional Chief Counsel. This has required a significant amount of the office's resources to train newly hired attorneys as well as substantial increases in workload office-wide, including the reassignment of over 250 district court cases and approximately 20 appellate cases. With a thirty day extension, Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees will be filed with the Court on January 30, 2012.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________

(via e-mail authorization on 12/21/2011)

SENGTHIENE BOSAVANTHE

Attorney for Appellant

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

________________________

ROYA MASSOUMI

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Respondent

ORDER

It is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The parties' stipulated request that the Commissioner be permitted an extension of time to file a brief in opposition to Plaintiff's EAJA application is GRANTED;
2. The Commissioner's opposition brief shall be filed on or before January 30, 2012;
3. Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before February 14, 2012;
4. Any supplemental requests for EAJA fees shall be included in the reply brief;
5. The Commissioner may file an optional sur-reply on or before February 29, 2012, responding to any supplemental request for EAJA fees contained in the reply brief; and
6. No further briefing will be permitted absent leave of court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Garcia v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Jan 3, 2012
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00542 SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Garcia v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JULIO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00542 SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)