From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Aljamal

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 23, 2022
21-cv-06541-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-06541-VC

06-23-2022

ORLANDO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. MOSLEH A. ALJAMAL, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING UNRUH ACT CLAIM RE: DKT. NO. 24

VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge.

The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. See Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F. 4th 1202, 1211-14 (9th Cir. 2021). The case is in its early stages, so concerns of judicial economy, convenience, fairness to litigants, and comity do not favor retaining jurisdiction. See id. at 1214. And the facts of the case-“a frequent filer of ADA and Unruh Act claims seeking federal jurisdiction to circumvent California's procedural barriers to such suits-present the type of exceptional circumstances contemplated by section 1367(c)(4)” to decline supplemental jurisdiction. Whitaker v. Alice & Olivia California Holdings LLC, 2022 WL 1135088, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2022).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Aljamal

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 23, 2022
21-cv-06541-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Garcia v. Aljamal

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. MOSLEH A. ALJAMAL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

21-cv-06541-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)