Opinion
22-cv-1009 (LJL)
01-17-2024
ORDER
LEWIS J. LIMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff's motion to exclude Defendant's Exhibit 7 is GRANTED. Plaintiff moved to exclude that exhibit on January 15, 2024. Dkt. No. 30. The Court ordered Defendant to file its response to that motion by 2:00 P.M. the following day. Dkt. No. 31. However, Defendant failed to do so. At Defendant's request, the Court permitted Defendant to submit a copy of Exhibit 7 to the Court by 7:00 P.M. on January 17, 2024 if Defendant intended to introduce the exhibit at trial. Once again, Defendant failed to comply with the Court-ordered deadline. In light of Defendant's repeated disregard for the Court's deadlines, the Court deems Plaintiff's motion to exclude Exhibit 7 unopposed. See Workman v. Namaste Techs., Inc., 2019 WL 280948, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2019); VSLP Krishtul v. VSLP United, LLC, 2014 WL 940941, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2014), aff'd, 648 Fed.Appx. 81 (2d Cir. 2016). The Court therefore grants Plaintiff's motion and excludes Defendant's Exhibit 7 from trial.
SO ORDERED.