From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia-Calderon v. F.C.I. Edgefield Warden

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 28, 2020
No. 20-6232 (4th Cir. Sep. 28, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6232

09-28-2020

JOEL GARCIA-CALDERON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. F.C.I. EDGEFIELD WARDEN; RECREATION YARD OFFICERS AND STAFF, Defendants - Appellees.

Joel Garcia-Calderon, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (9:18-cv-02947-TMC) Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joel Garcia-Calderon, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joel Garcia-Calderon appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Garcia-Calderon's complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Garcia-Calderon v. F.C.I. Edgefield Warden, No. 9:18-cv-02947-TMC (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Garcia-Calderon v. F.C.I. Edgefield Warden

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 28, 2020
No. 20-6232 (4th Cir. Sep. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Garcia-Calderon v. F.C.I. Edgefield Warden

Case Details

Full title:JOEL GARCIA-CALDERON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. F.C.I. EDGEFIELD WARDEN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 28, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6232 (4th Cir. Sep. 28, 2020)

Citing Cases

Holmes v. Borck

objections overruled, No. 9:18-CV-03473-DCC, 2020 WL 415899 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2020), aff'd, 824 Fed.Appx. 181…

Gong Yong v. Warden FCI Edgefield

otion under the Rule 56 standard for the remaining Bivens claims.See Bolden v. Blocker, No. CV…