From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garces v. Pickett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:17-cv-0319 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-0319 JAM AC P

07-29-2021

MANUEL GARCES, Plaintiff, v. J. PICKETT, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

Plaintiff has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's order filed June 15, 2021 (ECF No. 156). ECF No. 164. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) permits a party to object to non-dispositive orders issued by magistrate judges and requires that the district judge “modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” Plaintiff's objections, which outline his many issues with discovery, have no bearing on the appropriateness of the Magistrate Judge's order granting defendants' motion to seal and therefore fail to demonstrate that the order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's objections are overruled and the June 15, 2021 Order is affirmed.


Summaries of

Garces v. Pickett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:17-cv-0319 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Garces v. Pickett

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL GARCES, Plaintiff, v. J. PICKETT, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 29, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-0319 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)