From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garbutt v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 17, 2007
No. CIV S-05-2130 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 17, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2130 GEB KJM P.

May 17, 2007


ORDER


On January 26, 2007, the District Court adopted findings and recommendations and ordered that respondent's motion to dismiss be denied.

On May 8, 2007, petitioner filed a motion for the entry of a default judgment granting the petition for a writ of habeas corpus because respondent has not filed an answer.

Respondent's failure to file an answer does not entitle petitioner to habeas relief. Gordon v. Duran, 895 F.2d 610, 162 (9th Cir. 1990). Once the motion to dismiss was denied, however, respondent should have answered the petition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's May 8, 2007 motion for a default judgment and for sanctions is denied; and

2. Respondent is directed to file an answer to the petition within thirty days of the date of this order. Petitioner's reply, if any, is due twenty-one days after the answer is filed.


Summaries of

Garbutt v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 17, 2007
No. CIV S-05-2130 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Garbutt v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS GARBUTT, Petitioner, v. TOM L. CAREY, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 17, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2130 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 17, 2007)