From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garber v. Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 1949
274 App. Div. 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

January 24, 1949.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ. [ 194 Misc. 966.]


In an action for specific performance of a contract for the purchase of a business and its assets, judgment decreeing specific performance by appellant, as amended by order of July 30, 1948, and said amending order, modified upon the law by striking from the third ordering paragraph of the amending order, and from the last decretal paragraph of the judgment as amended by that order, the words "which sum shall be paid to the plaintiff if the judgment appealed from is affirmed, or the appeal dismissed". As so modified, the judgment and order appealed from are unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Garber v. Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 1949
274 App. Div. 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Garber v. Siegel

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP GARBER, Respondent, v. SOPHIE SIEGEL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1949

Citations

274 App. Div. 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Bidwell v. Long

Specific performance was a proper remedy (5 Williston, Contracts [rev. ed.], § 1422, p. 3975, and cases cited…