From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garaux v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00146-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00146-GBC (PC) Doc. 28

10-13-2011

RANDOLPH E. GARAUX, Plaintiff, v. CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Randolph E. Garaux ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to file a third amended complaint. (Doc. 28)

Plaintiff's motion is governed by Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that Plaintiff may amend with leave of the court, and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). "Rule 15(a) is very liberal and leave to amend 'shall be freely given when justice so requires.'" AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Dialysis West, Inc., 445 F.3d 1132, 1136 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)). However, courts "need not grant leave to amend where the amendment: (1) prejudices the opposing party; (2) is sought in bad faith; (3) produces an undue delay in the litigation; or (4) is futile." Id.

Plaintiff has demonstrated good cause for amending the complaint. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Garaux v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00146-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Garaux v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:RANDOLPH E. GARAUX, Plaintiff, v. CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00146-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)