From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garafolo v. A.M.F. White Plains Bowl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 283 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 6, 2000.

November 13, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated March 14, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Michael E. Pressman, New York, N.Y. (Steven H. Cohen of counsel), for appellant.

Anita Nissan Yehuda, Roslyn Heights, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries sustained at the defendant's bowling alley when he allegedly slipped on oil that had been applied to the bowling lane. The defendant did not establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law because it failed to "demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact" (St. Clair v. City of New York, 266 A.D.2d 277; see, Daniels v. Judelson, 215 A.D.2d 623; see also, Buckle v. Buhre Ave. Foods, 232 A.D.2d 269).


Summaries of

Garafolo v. A.M.F. White Plains Bowl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 283 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Garafolo v. A.M.F. White Plains Bowl

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK GARAFOLO, RESPONDENT, v. A.M.F. WHITE PLAINS BOWL, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 283 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 662

Citing Cases

Greenstein v. G.C

Although the defendant's procedures required that a blue mop, which was used to clean the kitchen and tended…

BRIGNONI v. BIG BOWL LLC

Although Leisure Time argues that plaintiff assumed the risks associated with bowling, it is well settled…