From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaona v. Dickens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12-CV-30 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12-CV-30

01-13-2014

MIGUEL ANGEL GAONA v. CAPTAIN PATRICK D. DICKENS, et al.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Miguel Angel Gaona, a state prisoner formerly confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action against the following defendants: Captain Patrick D. Dickens, Major Joe Smith, Theresa L. Ferris, Lieutenant Raymond W. Newberry, and Warden T. Simmons.

Plaintiff filed an amended petition on January 3, 2014 adding Correctional Officers Gary Spencer and Kristine O'Brian as defendants.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends the claims against Warden T. Simmons be dismissed for failure to state a claim and as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

Based on plaintiff's objections, it would appear it is plaintiff's belief that the Magistrate Judge is recommending the entire civil rights action be dismissed and plaintiff objects to the dismissal of the entire suit. The Magistrate Judge, however, recommended only that the claims against Warden T. Simmons be dismissed. Plaintiff makes no substantive objection to this recommendation. As such, the court finds the objections lacking in merit.

ORDER

Accordingly, the objections of petitioner are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A partial judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

_______

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gaona v. Dickens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12-CV-30 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Gaona v. Dickens

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL ANGEL GAONA v. CAPTAIN PATRICK D. DICKENS, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 13, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12-CV-30 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2014)