From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gantz v. Sutter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 21, 2015
C.A. No. 14-231 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2015)

Opinion

C.A. No. 14-231 Erie

08-21-2015

John Gantz, Petitioner, v. Warden Sutter, et al. Respondents.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE BAXTER

The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in this matter, recommending that this Court dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that Petitioner's claims are untimely. (Doc. No. 21). After reviewing the Report and Recommendation, the record, and all other materials before the Court and finding no objection, it is hereby ordered that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

(2) Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

(3) The petition shall be DENIED on the grounds that it is untimely;

(4) The certificate of appealability shall be DENIED;

(5) The Clerk of the Court shall send copies of this Order to Petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 21st day of August, 2015.

/s/

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gantz v. Sutter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 21, 2015
C.A. No. 14-231 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Gantz v. Sutter

Case Details

Full title:John Gantz, Petitioner, v. Warden Sutter, et al. Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 21, 2015

Citations

C.A. No. 14-231 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2015)