From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gant v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 28, 2017
Case No. CV 14-2618-CJC (SP) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-2618-CJC (SP)

08-28-2017

DARIUS GANT, Petitioner, v. RON E. BARNES, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. \\ \\

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to Amend (docket no. 35) is granted in part as follows: the proposed First Amended Petition lodged with the Motion to Amend is deemed filed as of August 25, 2016, but with the following claims stricken: Claim One(E), Claim Two, and the portion of Claim Four that incorporates and references Claim Two. DATED: August 28, 2017

/s/_________

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gant v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 28, 2017
Case No. CV 14-2618-CJC (SP) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Gant v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:DARIUS GANT, Petitioner, v. RON E. BARNES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 28, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 14-2618-CJC (SP) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2017)

Citing Cases

Bernardino v. Sandoval

This appointment was, of course, within the discretion of the court, for there is no constitutional right to…