From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ganley v. Kalikman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 3, 1930
148 A. 917 (N.J. 1930)

Opinion

Submitted May 31, 1929 —

Decided February 3, 1930.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 105 N.J.L. 311.

For the respondent, Carl Kisselman.

For the appellant, D. Trueman Stackhouse.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, CAMPBELL, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Ganley v. Kalikman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 3, 1930
148 A. 917 (N.J. 1930)
Case details for

Ganley v. Kalikman

Case Details

Full title:TERESA WALSH GANLEY, RESPONDENT, v. PHILIP KALIKMAN, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 3, 1930

Citations

148 A. 917 (N.J. 1930)
148 A. 917

Citing Cases

Wegmann v. Melniczak

On November 15th, 1943, defendants caused a letter to be written to the plaintiff cancelling the written…

Marschalk v. Weber

It is the settled rule that ordinarily a broker who is duly employed earns his commission when he procures…