From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gammichia v. Leman

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 4, 2011
Case No: 09-12231 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: 09-12231.

March 4, 2011


ORDER


The Court received Ms. Gammicchia's Motion to Set Aside Judge's Order to Enforce Settlement. The Court regards this as a motion for reconsideration under LR 7.1(h). Defendants filed a response to the motion, which the Court will accept.

The standard of review on a motion for reconsideration is as follows:

Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration that merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties and other persons entitled to be heard on the motion have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.

The Court considers the standard and Ms. Gammicchia's motion. The motion is DENIED. Ms. Gammicchia fails to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court has been misled. LR 7.1(h)(3).

IT IS ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2011


Summaries of

Gammichia v. Leman

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 4, 2011
Case No: 09-12231 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Gammichia v. Leman

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN GAMMICHIA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT L. LEMAN, ET AL, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 4, 2011

Citations

Case No: 09-12231 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 4, 2011)