From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamino v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Aug 9, 2021
No. 19-23844-CIV-MORE (S.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2021)

Opinion

19-23844-CIV-MORE 05-20235-CR-MORE

08-09-2021

Miami Division MARCOS GAMINO, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION TO VACATE

FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Lurana S. Snow, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Movant's Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 7), filed on October 31, 2019. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (D.E. 31) on July 16, 2021. The Court has reviewed the entire file and record. The Court has made a de novo review of the issues that the objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation present, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is

ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow's Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is

ADJUDGED that the motion to vacate is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. It is also

ADJUDGED that the Court issues a certificate of appealability on whether the Movant's claim is jurisdictional under United States v. Bane, 948 F.3d 1290, 1294 (11th Cir. 2020) or whether the procedural default rule applies as set forth in Granda v. United States, 900 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2021).

DONE AND ORDERED.

Lurana S. Snow, United States Magistrate Judge.


Summaries of

Gamino v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Aug 9, 2021
No. 19-23844-CIV-MORE (S.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Gamino v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Miami Division MARCOS GAMINO, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Aug 9, 2021

Citations

No. 19-23844-CIV-MORE (S.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2021)

Citing Cases

Veliz v. United States

This is because the valid and invalid predicate offenses for the §§ 924(o) and (c) convictions are…

Rosello v. United States

This is because the valid and invalid predicate offenses for the §§ 924(o) and (c) convictions are…