From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamez v. State

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Oct 2, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-685 (PGS) (D.N.J. Oct. 2, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-685 (PGS).

October 2, 2008


ORDER


On February 4, 2008, Plaintiff filed a complaint against several defendants, including the States of New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania. Plaintiff also alleged unlawful behavior by various unnamed individuals. This Court has reviewed Plaintiff's submissions and finds:

WHEREAS all named defendants are states and are immune from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment. Lombardo v. Penn. Dept. Of Public Welfare, 540 F.3d 190, 193 (3d Cir. 2008);

WHEREAS all incidents listed in Plaintiff's complaint took place outside of New Jersey, and Plaintiff avers that he is a citizen of New York who has visited California, Florida, and Pennsylvania, but does not indicate whether he has ever visited New Jersey;

WHEREAS this Court cannot find any defendant who has "purposefully avail[ed him or herself] of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws," which is necessary for this court to exercise personal jurisdiction. Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475 (1985).

Good cause having been shown, it is hereby

ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED in its entirety without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule 12(b)(2).


Summaries of

Gamez v. State

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Oct 2, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-685 (PGS) (D.N.J. Oct. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Gamez v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO BROOKS GAMEZ, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Oct 2, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-685 (PGS) (D.N.J. Oct. 2, 2008)