From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamesa Energy U.S., LLC v. Ten Penn Ctr. Assocs., L.P.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Aug 20, 2018
191 A.3d 749 (Pa. 2018)

Opinion

No. 139 EAL 2018 No. 152 EAL 2018

08-20-2018

GAMESA ENERGY USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Petitioners v. TEN PENN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Respondents Gamesa Energy USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Respondents v. Ten Penn Center Associates, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Petitioners


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal at 139 EAL 2018 is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:

1. May a litigant simultaneously pursue inconsistent, alternative remedies in a civil action in Pennsylvania prior to the entry of final judgment?
2. When one party to a contract breaches, should the non-breaching party be permitted to continue performance, if reasonable under the circumstances, and to maintain, in the alternative, causes of action for termination of the agreement if material, or if not material, for damages from the breach?

The Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal at 152 EAL 2018 is DENIED.


Summaries of

Gamesa Energy U.S., LLC v. Ten Penn Ctr. Assocs., L.P.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Aug 20, 2018
191 A.3d 749 (Pa. 2018)
Case details for

Gamesa Energy U.S., LLC v. Ten Penn Ctr. Assocs., L.P.

Case Details

Full title:GAMESA ENERGY USA, LLC AND GAMESA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION INC., Petitioners…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 20, 2018

Citations

191 A.3d 749 (Pa. 2018)

Citing Cases

Gamesa Energy U.S., LLC v. Ten Penn Ctr. Assocs.

When one party to a contract breaches, should the non-breaching party be permitted to continue performance,…