From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamboa v. Dist. Attorney Advasary Sys., Riverside Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2023
23-cv-02801-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-02801-JD

08-02-2023

CLEMENTE MANUEL GAMBOA JR., Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY ADVASARY SYSTEM, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Defendant.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO United States District Judge.

Plaintiff, a detainee acting pro se, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was provided twenty-eight days to correct these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not paid the fee or filed a complete application to proceed IFP. The case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gamboa v. Dist. Attorney Advasary Sys., Riverside Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2023
23-cv-02801-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Gamboa v. Dist. Attorney Advasary Sys., Riverside Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:CLEMENTE MANUEL GAMBOA JR., Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY ADVASARY…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 2, 2023

Citations

23-cv-02801-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)