From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamboa v. Carney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 21, 1998
250 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 21, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).


We agree with the motion court that whatever might be the effect of aging on the progress or manifestation of an infants lead poisoning symptoms, aging is not an unusual or unanticipated circumstance warranting departure from the readiness rule prohibiting physical examinations after a note of issue is filed ( 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; see, Price v. Bloomingdale's, 166 A.D.2d 151). No excuse is offered for failing to seek this additional physical examination of the infant plaintiff no later than 20 days after the filing of the note of issue ( 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Gamboa v. Carney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 21, 1998
250 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Gamboa v. Carney

Case Details

Full title:SHAYANIE GAMBOA, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, VIRGINIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 21, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 876

Citing Cases

Ferris v. MTA Capital Constr. Co.

ual or unanticipated circumstances develop subsequent to the filing of a note of issue and certificate of…