From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamble v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 4, 2006
No. CV 05-2036-PHX-EHC (D. Ariz. Apr. 4, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 05-2036-PHX-EHC.

April 4, 2006


ORDER


On February 9, 2006, Magist rat e Judge Lawrence O. Anderson issued a Report and Recommendation [dkt. 8], recommending the dismissal of this case without prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed an Objection or otherwise responded.

Plaintiff has not served Defendant Arpaio, notwithstanding the Court's Order [dkt. 4] of November 9, 2005 direct ing service. On December 16, 2005, Magistrate Judge Anderson ordered Plaint iff to show cause by January 5, 2006 why this case should not dismissed [dkt. 6]; Plaintiff has not responded.

The show cause order [dkt. 6] was returned to the Court as undeliverable. Research by the Clerk of Court discovered an address for a Bruce Gamble in a Federal Correctional Instutition in Littleton, CO and the show cause order was sent to that address. [Dkt. 7]. On February 21, 2006, Bruce Lee Gamble in custody in Littleton, CO wrote a letter to the Court advising that he is not the Bruce Allison Gamble who filed this suit.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted in full. [Dkt. 8].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint [Dkt. 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Gamble v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 4, 2006
No. CV 05-2036-PHX-EHC (D. Ariz. Apr. 4, 2006)
Case details for

Gamble v. Arpaio

Case Details

Full title:Bruce Allison Gamble, Plaintiff, v. Joe Arpaio, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

No. CV 05-2036-PHX-EHC (D. Ariz. Apr. 4, 2006)