From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamarra v. McKutchen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 4, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-01991 (D.D.C. Oct. 4, 2016)

Opinion

Case: 1:16-cv-01991

10-04-2016

Jean Paul Gamarra, Plaintiff, v. Bingham McKutchen, Defendant.


(F-Deck)
Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 10/6/2016
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (requiring dismissal of a case upon a determination that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or is frivolous).

Plaintiff sues a New York-based law firm but for what conduct is wholly unclear. The complaint is captioned: "Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Rule 8 Complaint to Execute Treason." Plaintiff begins as follows: "The Plaintiff met the man that is responsible for delusional dementia defined by Black History of Black on Black slavery called sunset." Compl. at 1. The complaint continues in this incoherent manner for nine additional pages. A separate order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

United States District Judge Date: October 4, 2016


Summaries of

Gamarra v. McKutchen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 4, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-01991 (D.D.C. Oct. 4, 2016)
Case details for

Gamarra v. McKutchen

Case Details

Full title:Jean Paul Gamarra, Plaintiff, v. Bingham McKutchen, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Oct 4, 2016

Citations

Case: 1:16-cv-01991 (D.D.C. Oct. 4, 2016)