From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gamache v. Groenig

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Oct 23, 1997
87 Wn. App. 1109 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997)

Summary

stating that because "RCW 4.84.330 was based upon California Civil Code sec. 1717, . . . California cases interpreting that section are persuasive"

Summary of this case from Blendheim v. Note Holder (In re Blendheim)

Opinion

No. 15567-6-III.

October 23, 1997. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 94-2-00421-1, Robert N. Hackett, J., entered February 16, 1996.


Affirmed in part and reversed in part by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J. Pro Tem., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Schultheis, J.


Summaries of

Gamache v. Groenig

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Oct 23, 1997
87 Wn. App. 1109 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997)

stating that because "RCW 4.84.330 was based upon California Civil Code sec. 1717, . . . California cases interpreting that section are persuasive"

Summary of this case from Blendheim v. Note Holder (In re Blendheim)
Case details for

Gamache v. Groenig

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH GAMACHE, ET AL., Appellants , v. GERALD L. GROENIG, ET AL.…

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three

Date published: Oct 23, 1997

Citations

87 Wn. App. 1109 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997)
87 Wash. App. 1109

Citing Cases

Blendheim v. Note Holder (In re Blendheim)

Although Washington and California courts have developed their own interpretations of their statutes'…