From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galzinski v. City of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CIV S-10-2860 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2860 KJM CKD P

01-05-2012

HARALD MARK GALZINSKI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full;
2. Defendant Wimple's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 29) is granted; and
3. Defendant Wimple is dismissed from this action.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Galzinski v. City of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CIV S-10-2860 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Galzinski v. City of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:HARALD MARK GALZINSKI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2860 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)