From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galvin v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2012
Case Number: 2:06-CV-14515 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 2:06-CV-14515

10-15-2012

DONZELL GALVIN, Petitioner, v. CARMEN PALMER, Respondent.


HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS


OPINION AND ORDER (1) DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER'S MOTION

TO STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS SEVEN AMENDED HABEAS CLAIMS

AND (2) GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO

APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Petitioner Donzell Galvin filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner, a state inmate incarcerated at the Michigan Reformatory in Ionia, Michigan, challenged his convictions for two counts of first-degree murder. On September 10, 2012, the Court denied the petition and denied a certificate of appealability. Now before the Court are Petitioner's Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss Seven Amended Habeas Claims and Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis.

In his motion to strike, Petitioner asks the Court to construe his habeas petition to include seven claims that he previously requested be stricken from the petition. The Court denied the petition and, in doing so, addressed the seven claims that are the subject of Petitioner's motion. The motion will be denied as moot.

Petitioner also seeks leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1) provides that a party to a district-court action who desires to appeal in forma pauperis must file a motion in the district court. An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the court determines that it is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). "[T]o determine that an appeal is in good faith, a court need only find that a reasonable person could suppose that the appeal has some merit." Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 631 (7th Cir. 2000). While the Court held that jurists of reason would not find the Court's decision that the petition was meritless to be debatable or wrong, the Court finds that an appeal may be taken in good faith.

The Court DENIES AS MOOT Petitioner's "Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss 7 Amended Habeas Claims" [dkt. # 76] and GRANTS Petitioner's "Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis" [dkt. # 79].

SO ORDERED.

______________

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record and Donzell Galvin by electronic means or U.S. Mail on October 15, 2012.

Carol A. Pinegar

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Galvin v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2012
Case Number: 2:06-CV-14515 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Galvin v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:DONZELL GALVIN, Petitioner, v. CARMEN PALMER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 2:06-CV-14515 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2012)