Opinion
2:19-cv-00321-RSL
06-30-2023
LEOBARDO MORENO GALVEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UR JADDOU, et al., Defendants.
TESSA M. GORMAN, Acting United States Attorney, MATT WALDROP, Assistant United States Attorney, Attorneys for Defendants MATT ADAMS, Attorney for Plaintiffs
TESSA M. GORMAN, Acting United States Attorney, MATT WALDROP, Assistant United States Attorney, Attorneys for Defendants
MATT ADAMS, Attorney for Plaintiffs
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE
ROBERT S. LASNIK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COME NOW, Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 10(g) and 16, and hereby jointly stipulate and move for an extension of 14 days until July 28, 2023 for the parties to submit a joint status report.
A court may modify a deadline for good cause. Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b). Continuing dates is within the discretion of the trial judge. See King v. State of California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986). The parties previously attempted to achieve a negotiated settlement of Plaintiffs' claims. Dkt. 85. That attempt was unsuccessful, and the Court directed the parties to submit a joint status report on or before July 14, 2023. Id. The Court ordered the parties to propose amendments to the current permanent injunction that “are consistent with the Ninth Circuit's instructions and analysis.” Id. The Defendants are consulting on a proposal and need additional time to complete that work.
Therefore, the parties believe good cause exists for a brief stay to allow the parties to prepare the joint status report. In light of the above, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court:
1. Extend until July 28, 2023 the deadline for the parties to submit a joint status report.
I certify that this memorandum contains 216 words, in compliance with the Local Rules.
ORDER
The parties having stipulated and agreed, it is hereby so ORDERED.