Opinion
No. 05-05-01444-CR
Opinion Filed November 8, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F05-53222-Sli. Affirm.
Before Justices WRIGHT, O'NEILL, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Roberto Galvan of aggravated robbery. The jury assessed punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief concluding the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We informed appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.