From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GALTROF v. I.G. FARBENINDUSTRIE AG

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 21, 1945
186 Misc. 107 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)

Opinion

December 21, 1945.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, EVANS, J.

Herbert S. Ogden for appellant.

H. David Frackman and Michael E. Rosenstein for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


It was error to deny the defendant's motion for a stay. (See Watts, Watts Co. v. Unione Austriaca, c., 248 U.S. 9.) In the circumstances summary judgment should not have been granted.

The order denying motion for stay should be reversed, and motion granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. The judgment and order granting summary judgment should be vacated. The order of April 30, 1942, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed.

HAMMER, McLAUGHLIN and EDER, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

GALTROF v. I.G. FARBENINDUSTRIE AG

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 21, 1945
186 Misc. 107 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
Case details for

GALTROF v. I.G. FARBENINDUSTRIE AG

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL GALTROF, Respondent, v. I.G. FARBENINDUSTRIE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1945

Citations

186 Misc. 107 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
59 N.Y.S.2d 724