Opinion
14-P-1387
06-10-2015
DONNA M. GALLUZZO v. JOHN F. GALLUZZO.
NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to its rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 (2009), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore, may not fully address the facts of the case or the panel's decisional rationale. Moreover, such decisions are not circulated to the entire court and, therefore, represent only the views of the panel that decided the case. A summary decision pursuant to rule 1:28 issued after February 25, 2008, may be cited for its persuasive value but, because of the limitations noted above, not as binding precedent. See Chace v. Curran, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 258, 260 n.4 (2008).
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28
The defendant appeals from an order of the District Court, extending to May 12, 2015, an existing restraining order issued pursuant to G. L. c. 209A. However, the record furnished by the defendant is inadequate to substantiate his claims of error. In particular, the defendant has failed to submit a transcript of the hearing, upon which his claims of error are substantially based. See Shawmut Community Bank, N.A. v. Zagami, 411 Mass. 807, 811-812 (1992).
In the absence of record support for the defendant's claims of error, we affirm the order.
So ordered.
By the Court (Green, Milkey & Maldonado, JJ.),
The panelists are listed in order of seniority.
Clerk Entered: June 10, 2015.